Criteria selection and version clarity
Accessibility & ADA · WCAG
WCAG-informed evaluation with defined scope
We use WCAG as a technical framework for evaluation and remediation—reporting what was tested, against which criteria, and with what methods.
Start a WCAG Support Project All Accessibility & ADA services
Situations that bring teams here
- Teams claim AA without defining pages tested
- Design and engineering argue from different criteria versions
- Need WCAG mapping for stakeholders without overstating results
- Remediation backlog unprioritized against success criteria
What we can evaluate or remediate
Scoped evaluation
Mapping findings to success criteria
Remediation guidance
Transparent reporting
Retest of agreed items
Practical outcomes
- Clearer structure and interaction for people using assistive technology
- Documented findings your stakeholders can review
- A scoped path forward instead of open-ended risk language
How we approach this work
-
Define version and scope
Which pages, documents, or flows?
-
Evaluate against criteria
Document methods used.
-
Prioritize remediations
Tie work to user impact and criteria.
-
Report clearly
No silent assumptions about untested content.
Validation approach
WCAG is a technical standard—not interchangeable with ADA or Section 508. Conformance claims require defined scope and methods.
Important notice
Accessibility requirements vary by organization, jurisdiction, content, and use case. UnifyBoard™ provides accessibility evaluation and remediation services, not legal advice or regulatory certification.
Ready to start?
Describe the content, volume, and deadlines that matter. We will help scope a practical next step.